Please note that my blog has moved to http://www.pixmonix.com/blog.
Thanks for visiting!
Upturn in orders Nov 2009
1 month ago
Scanning, transferring, converting, and protecting memories
Continuing the discussion of Polaroid that I started in the demise of Polaroid... IEEE Spectrum has published two relevant articles this year. | |
The first article, Polaroid 2.0, declared that the first product to come out of the remains of Polaroid -- the engineers formed a new company called Zink to continue the work that was started before the parent Polaroid corporation died - dead on arrival. The article cites the costs, and the toy-like characteristics of this first product - small prints, inconvenient -- and consigns it for novelty use only. They also cited it's inclusion in a toy-like camera by Tomy as the beginning of the end for the product. I think that this is a typical response to disruptive innovation. "It will only work for low-end applications." "It's too expensive." "It doesn't perform as well as my current XXX." All true. All completely missing the point. The second article in the print Spectrum, Zink: A Modern Fairy Tale, (online title is "Zink: Inkless Printing With Colorless Color") was a bit more even handed in its treatment of Zink and their product plans. It also gave a much more detailed view of how the technology works and what it takes to bring a technology to life after the death of the parent corporation. The technology itself is very clever. Paper is permeated with three chemicals that are uncolored initially. However, when they are heated, the change colors to produce yellow, magenta, and cyan colors, respectively. The trick is that the chemicals change color at different temperatures and with different heating times. A very clever design in the print head and controlling electronics (along with these magic chemicals) applies the right temperatures for the right amount of time to get the colors to mix properly to form full color images. Interestingly, they don't use a black chemical - analogous to the black inks in most ink jet printers. Perhaps they can produce satisfactory blacks by using the CMY colors. In an inkjet printer this may be too expensive (in terms of ink used) or produce poor results (too much ink required to do it precisely without bleed to adjacent pixels?). This is an amazing piece of research and engineering. I haven't seen any sample prints from these printers. So... if Zink has their way there will be no more ink to buy for our printers. But you will need to buy this special (patented, and presumable not cheap) paper. Hmmm. I think that I would rather buy ink, even though it is a pain and it is expensive. At least I can choose my paper form, format, texture, etc. without needing to have support from a single paper manufacturer. And... I can use generic ink, even though it is a big pain a lot of the time. | |
